Nuke 'em
The day may come when words will not suffice anymore. When this befalls, we shall hit them hard, and hit them fast.
For now, I just hope they will not reply in kind...
Did you eat their brownies? DID YOU EAT THEIR BROWNIES?! (Eric Cartman)
The day may come when words will not suffice anymore. When this befalls, we shall hit them hard, and hit them fast.
Gepostet von
dee
at
Friday, May 04, 2007
Oh my God. How could I not see this? Painting "Make love, not noise" on those diggers was not at all some cute hippie girls' joyous expression of protest against noise pollution. How could this escape my otherwise so thorough scrutiny?
If you do a quick google-search on "make love not noise", you will of course find that one of the first hits leads you to a public proclamation of the Freiburg revolutionary forces! The graffiti, which I first thought was an almost heart-warming college-kid night action, was in fact a subversive call for a huge hippie street party!
Unlike the South Park hippie jam festival, however, this was not a spontaneously occurring, though eventually mushrooming beyond control, get-together of a handful of no-good dopeheads. This thing that was going down here last Tuesday was serious anarchist stuff, and — it was for real. They even had an action samba band (sounds real bad, eh?) with them.
But then, on second thought, I suppose it all was pretty boring. Like, you know, the usual bunch of misguided bums who want to make the world a better place (and start right now!). Probably looked kinda like this:
Gepostet von
dee
at
Wednesday, May 02, 2007
0
Kommentare
Just a block from where my office is, they are digging up the road with those two trackhoes that make you think a tank platoon is patrolling the neighborhood.
Here's how Freiburg citizens express their protest against the situation:
Gepostet von
dee
at
Wednesday, May 02, 2007
0
Kommentare
I'm still clueless. A couple of days ago, I saw a guy who had this patch sewn over the EASTPAK-label on his bag that said: "Cancel history, stop hatred".
Gepostet von
dee
at
Monday, April 30, 2007
0
Kommentare
I am a fairly reasonable man. I have a nice job. I have friends and a family who both value my judgment on things. I'm generally known as a thoughtful, rather cautious person, although I make my share of mistakes. I am mostly content with what I am, and in cases I'm not, I'm working on it.
Until quite recently, I have never thought of creating a blog. The present development of increasingly making one's private life a matter of public interest is not my cup of tea.
And although I acknowledge that there are numerous instances where blogs are put to some very practical use, I have at the same time to admit that I still consider blogging mainly a communication domain of lonesome, ailurophile Kansas City web developers, college sophomores spending their year abroad partying and young professionals posting annoying political rantings that nobody really cares about.
Now, you may think, these are somewhat stereotypical views I'm putting forward here. You are right, of course. People need stereotypes to cope with their surroundings. Without stereotypical, or rather prototypical, notions of the experienceable world, people might not be able to survive very long.
I tend to believe that prototypes can somehow be described as mental representations that prevent our minds from being flooded with huge amounts of completely new information each time perceptual data is being processed. If this is true, then prototypes are the basis of our surprisingly natural capability to deal with diversity. In short, prototypes are good for mental health.
(There is some dispute, to be sure, over whether prototype models or exemplar models are better suited to account for questions of cognitive categorization, but there is no need here to go into these, for present purposes at least, hairsplitting details.)
Prototypical members of a category are not necessarily defined by frequency of occurrence. A German Shepherd is a good example of a prototypical dog in most Western societies, though that does not imply that the German Shepherd is the kind of dog you run into on a daily basis. Similarly, the urban pigeon might not be reasonably be seen as a prototypical bird, however often you may find what a nuissance they can be if you live in an urban area.
In some places, however, things are different. This is where the present effort to go public with my concerns comes in.
I live in Freiburg, a pretty little town in Germany that you can think of as the capital of the Black Forest. Here, prototypicality and frequency of occurrence are more closely related than the theory predicts. This is particularly evident in the case of the local residents.
Usually, urban civilisations show a relatively high degree of diversification. There are countless population strata that are intricately interwoven, and actual specimens of what might come close to being prototypical members of the town's population are rarely encountered.
It's not only that, for example, mental representations of the typical New Yorker look pretty much different, depending on whether you are in Manhatten or in the Bronx. People may well have quite specific ideas of what the typical New Yorker might look like, or what the New Yorkers' attitudes towards their lives and hometown might be. But I still think German Shepherds are easier to find than typical New Yorkers. If you intend to find actual instances of prototype representations of New Yorkers, you will have to differentiate between typical Wall Street employees, typical New York cabbies, typical New York homeless and so on.
The situation is similar in German cities like Berlin and Hamburg and also in smaller towns like Bonn, for example. In the latter case, it is even almost impossible to define a bundle of features that taken together make up the prototypical local resident.
While this accounts for the relative diversity you would expect from urban areas, Freiburg clearly can be taken as a counterexample. The number of real-world occurrences of prototypical local residents far exceeds that of other citizen subgroups. In other words: there is a stronger than expected tendency for members of the category Freiburg resident to exhibit prototypicality.
Of course, this is only a very general statement and it would be hugely unfair to simply lump together all those people. Strictly speaking, as is the case with typical New York cabbies, New York bankers and so on, you will have to differentiate. In the present case we may, quite comfortably, define the category members' age as the criterium for further discriminating between subcategories of this particular population.
We can then roughly distinguish between three age groups, or subcategories:
Gepostet von
dee
at
Friday, April 27, 2007
0
Kommentare